Home

July 14, 2006
by Matt Barr

Plame goes all Ron Goldman on Cheney

Insofar as I'm pretty sure the lawsuit isn't so much about justice and redress and recompense and etc. as it is about giving the administration the finger, it probably doesn't matter, but there's a fairly profund difference between suing after a criminal acquittal and suing after the prosecutor fails to so much as indict. The standard for acquittal in criminal court is proof beyond a reasonable doubt; you can be guilty by a preponderance of the evidence, which rings your bell as a civil plaintiff, without going to jail. We all learned this from O.J. But the standard for indicting somebody for something is generally my elbow only bends one way, which is to say about the only way not ot get indicted is to be so not guilty as to be laughed at for excessive piety and goodwill toward your fellow man. I can't see this working out well in court.

Browse books from Amazon.com:

Comments
bujeeboo posted:

However, it will be interesting to have to get Dick Cheney and others testify in open court.

I don't think Fitzgerald had the evidence. However there is another possibility, and that is he didn't have enough evidence and wouldn't have it for a very long time, well past the statute of limitations for the civil case. Given the options, I think Fitz probably ended it right when he did knowing that Plame would still have 40 or so days to file her case.

This Administration deserves the finger.

July 16, 2006 1:05 PM


Post a comment

Due to comment spam, please enter the five-digit security code along with your comment. I'm sorry for the hassle.

Terms of use/privacy policy (opens in new window)




Remember Me?

(HTML ok)

Enter this security code below along with your comment:




Home | Law | Written material © 2006 Matt Barr | Reproduce only with proper attribution |